7 votes
mass attacks
The mass attacks are a bit ridiculous currently. I like that players in the top seats are no longer invulnerable, they shouldn't be, but it should be a bit harder to do so much damage to them and everyone else. Either reduce the amount of damage done by failed attacks or limit how many turn 1 player may spend on them.
No one should have an invulnerable account. Everything should be sabbable and anyone being an asshat should be able to have their accounts seriously harmed for being one.
alwaysl00king2
Sorry Keneva, I know you don't know me, and I have to say I agree with you. I do agree that "retreated attacks" should be better than they already are. Maybe having someone with 1:5 attack:defense ratio should retreat. To have some n00b attack you from a fake account that can't be caught, is annoying, and this should help.
9 months ago
alwaysl00king2
If you have the attacks saved up, you should be able to use them where you want. I don't like the limits of attackng xxxxx so many times a day. Yes, I've been burned, and will probably be burned again with this...but I still feel that if you have attack turns, you should be able to use them as you please. (I think retreated turns should count as a turn)
9 months ago
Keneva
Having less turns should help out with the number of attacks. Most might not want to hear this from a "ranker," but they should raise the SA needed to get "defended" rather than "retreated." Less than 1% of the target's DA to do damage - and it doesn't take much for 1 person with a little SA to do major damage.
3 days ago XXXX Attack defended 1 5 48,757,115 2,241,198,906 details
9 months ago