98 votes
Raise the sab ratios
Allow us to sab more of a player's armory. There are people with 120 BPMs and I can't touch a one of them.....grrrrr.........
Allow us to sab more of a player's armory. There are people with 120 BPMs and I can't touch a one of them.....grrrrr.........
22nd ranked
shadowtheif
i think there should be noob protection, but only for the first week or two. then you can sab. also, i recon that they should bring back the sab turns so people can't just clean up like 20 peoples armouries in a day
4 months ago
sh4d0w_aLch3mis7
if someone sabs you and you dont like it, sab back!! thats what it's there for, diplomacy
5 months ago
Micheal_Jacksons_Glove
whats more ridicoulous is the jerks that run around sabbing absurd ammounts of your armory, in retalliation for too many hits, or not enough gold stolen (whatever lame rule they make up) that is completely not proportional to the offense and for that im glad there is "noob protection"
6 months ago
TheDarkMonk
im talking guys with hundreds of bpm or anything else if they aint got 1000 or more you cannot sab them. thats rediculous
7 months ago
TheDarkMonk
can try and get rid of noob protection. This age "noob protection" almost goes to rank 200 :P.
quote from feril at 105 rank i can be unsabbable except for my sentry tools which you can get 1 at a time only that aint newb protection thats just plain sab destruction i know we all complained about dn81 and his style but there has to be a middle point not just one side or other.
7 months ago
alwaysl00king2
I agree with DarkMonk. But I don't agree the sab ratio's need to be raised. I say if somoene is holding one item, it should be able to be sabbed by somoene with the right spy power. A minimum of one item should be able to be sabbed until the current ratio is met. Yes, there should be n00b protection, but I say if you are getting sabbed you deserve it or u need to find a new commander!
8 months ago
TheDarkMonk
I think it is crap that anyone with a top 200 defense action cant have there defense sabbed this is ridiculous. I cannot sab someones da who has 111mil da why not im so sick of seeing your officers inform you you cant get away with sabbing that much of an opponents armory its absolutely ridiculous and i cannot believe this is not in the top this needs voted up
8 months ago
Jumanal
Either allow us to Sab like we used to or take spy and sentry away completely because as far as I'm concerned now, the only thing it does is shield your money from sight and allow you to see other treasuries. It's useless in that aspect and should be removed if allowed to continue in such a meaningless fasion.
9 months ago
Jumanal
Why have sabotage if you can't even do it? I'm tired of not being able to hit someone, just ONE of their BPM's or IS's because it's too much even if they have 100. I'm tired of losing Nunchukus when trying to Sab a some piddly little shield or scimitar and losing more money to some jerk who hits you 10 times in a row because he doesn't know why he can only take 5% of your money per attack.
9 months ago
Assassin-
That will be sweet.
9 months ago
alwaysl00king2
Feril you pretty much say what our alliance has stated. Don't allow sabs until the successful ones are used. We like the idea of having 10 sab turns against a person TOTAL. However I differ on this. I would like to see sab turns back, and equal to attack turns, and u can use them how you like. Failed sabs do count as a sab turn. Oh ya make a min sab too. This will prevent "sab proof"
9 months ago
Feril
I say raise the sab ammounts, but take away that bs about sabbing as long as you want till you get everything possible.
I don't know who the sentries are, but you'd think they'd catch on eventually?
If sabbing is more, make it harder to get through, limit the ammount of times you can try and get rid of noob protection. This age "noob protection" almost goes to rank 200 :P.
9 months ago
hackman
3 <=is what i give ,sorry am dumb dunno how to vote
9 months ago
hackman
i mean to raise the sab abilities
9 months ago
hackman
AGREED !
9 months ago
pamdora
As a "larger account" w/ a decent amount of weapons (its insane how many towers i can have sabbed lol) The percent itself doesn't need to be changed but make it to where anyone with more than hmmm say 50 or even 100 of any type weapon then at least 1 of each weapon above that amount can be sabbed. It won't "destroy" smaller accounts but at least make it to where they are not totally invulnerable
9 months ago
alwaysl00king2
I think the problem here is determining "what is a smaller account" Maybe instead make it so that a minimum of 1 item can be sabbed (if you are successful). Make the sab ratio of .5 spy needed to successfully sab. Get rid of the ability to sab stuff already sabbed. My spies should be smarter than that..that's why I trained them.
9 months ago
Darth Bob
Yeah, I agree, should have changed the wording to increase sab ratios on smaller accounts, makes more sense.
Btw, BSS didn't start this one, it was all me ;-)
9 months ago
krisv
I agree, but only for the small accounts, those lil accounts can't be hurt at all.
big account on the other hands, can be hurt hard if you do something good.
So like Shane said: change the n00bprotection ;)
9 months ago
Trekie4ever
uhh hmmm... bss must've started this one ;-p
no no no! sab ratios are too high too me lol. mil spy and unsabbable *pouts*
9 months ago
Darth Bob
I agree with the different ratios for different sized accounts, they have that already, just make those ratios bigger :P
Personally I'm sick of those guys that have tons of SA, are farming chain members, and they're unsabble. Its ridiculous...
9 months ago
Darmael
Indeed, how pathetic that someone with 45 million spy can be unsabbable, and terroroize at will, lol.
9 months ago
Shane
Change the n00b protection... Fair play, Have a different ratio for big guys, To small guys, But atlease let people be able to do SOME damage to those small rough accounts who's soal perpose is to annoy the crap out of people
9 months ago
Sheepeeshaun
it's easy to outgrow someone who is unsabbable
9 months ago
o_O-
Sab ratios should be proportional to account size (or TBG, in other words).
9 months ago
pamdora
agreed!
9 months ago