3 votes
add mercenaries for spies and sentries
Untrained soldiers are protected by untrained mercenaries. Trained soldiers are protected by trained mercenaries. Why must spies and sentries remain vulnerable? It's hard enough to get gold as it is, without also losing the income from those spies and sentries dying all the time...
alwaysl00king2
I'm not against having mercenaries protect spies and sentries. Instead of making a new mercenary, maybe the untrained can cover this area too?
7 months ago
Feril
It wouldn't be that bad overall, but the best way to save the coverts IMO is have as little as possible untill you need them. Losing a few here and there isn't bad when you can click 3k/day between two recruiters.
But maybe 1% or something would be alright, much more would be to much.
8 months ago
jaylweb
I suggested this a couple of ages ago. I'm still for it. you can still cap how many mercs you can buy. I guarantee they would be hard to buy as well, so sabbers can still be vulnerable. Besides, you can just sab their tools. :P
8 months ago
chemikills
im against this
Sabbers can then be made less vulnerable without needing DA to protect against 5*1
8 months ago