powered by UserVoice

chemikills's profile

Default-avatar
  1. 3
  2. 8
  3. 27
  4. 8
  5. 84
  6. 2

chemikills

Open ideas
  1. 279 votes
    2
  2. 415 votes
    3
  3. 5 votes
    3
Completed ideas

None

Declined ideas

None

Comments
  1. more than 10 attacks is far to damaging to an account
    Limit them plz :)

  2. no all game activites are not pointless
    If you were to be attacking all the time rather than clicking we all know that is a lot more fun
    Clicking is boring and monotonous
    Attacking actually requires a process of thought
    That way it comes down to more of your strategy rather than how much boring activity you can do.
    Attacking requires strategy as where to spend the gold also

  3. haha I know I don't have to click. I just want to raise awareness of how boring this game will get with unlimited clicking. Sit on your ass clicking all day.
    YAY I win I spent the most time doing a pointless activity.
    I'm just being honest and trying to open some eyes to how silly this game could get with things such as this implemented

  4. ... Ooo I win I can click more than you whahaha, seriously is that the game you wanna play. I'm sure even a clicker has better things to do seriously!

  5. Why do you want to make clicking unlimited. This game should be about fun and strategy. NOt about who can click the most
    Clicking is monotonous, why do you want to do more, to beat the rest? They'll just catch up and click unlimited just like you, they might beat you
    Clicking is a dumb system, making it unlimited will take any strategy that was in the game away. It will be all click click click

  6. .... Will get the game no where :P

  7. Lets be honest tho clicking is boring
    Clicking is not fun at all, and yet is required to succeed in this game which is pretty dumb
    So you might say every game has clicking...
    WRONG age2.fallofempires.com
    Full on strategy, no monotonous activity at all, just full on gameplay
    If you guys don't like KOC for the clicking and pyramid growth, join that game
    Otherwise having clicking without pyramind

  8. Before you vote on this give it some thought
    If we have no pyramid growth then we just have a bunch of players who play alone or together it wont matter
    Everyone will click the lists and get the same amount of soldiers
    Little will be different
    So it will become who can take down the enemy the most so there best player wins
    So PR will win every age
    This really hasnt been thought thru

  9. Ability to delete unwanted members, allocate other admins and send out MMs

  10. i think it would be more suited that if SA weps are better then DA weps then Spy should be better then sentry as it is
    I fail to see how bringing SA and DA into it supports your arguement. I rather think it opposes it!

  11. I think sentry tools should be sabbable but i think sentry tools should be harder to sab and also support kenevas idea

  12. 242 anonymous votes. All from people who are too lazy to sign up there name on this site. Need i say more...

  13. yes no need for another race right now. Vampires is incredibly lame too

  14. yeh I don't like this. people used admuncher with keyloggers. Then some people will pay and others will not. I say just scrap ads on Recruit ID pages altogether.

  15. It has always been a tempting Idea. I think that yes you should have to repair it at about 75% of the actual cost. So you make 25%. Thing is though its obviously harder to steal then sabotage, But we don't want to make it so small players are constantly being robbed.
    So it would be hard to script methinks

  16. only problem is That with current sab rules it would then be very easy to keep your account unsabbable while keeping it very strong as a whole

  17. yes but it will mean people can hoard large amounts of soldiers in attack that will be untouchable to others...
    Bad idea

  18. I assume you want this for upgrades
    Just bank in knives like everyone else :P

  19. yes but it will mean people can hoard large amounts of soldiers in attack that will be untouchable to others...
    Bad idea

  20. yes but it will mean people can hoard large amounts of soldiers in attack that will be untouchable to others...
    Bad idea

  21. Im not saying remove ads altogether
    The fact is recruit IDs will give the most hits to a site with an Ad
    But the actually clicks on the ad will be sooo low
    I want more ads for ingame stuff
    But none on recruiters
    As the point I make, if you put ads where ppl dont want them they will use ad blockers and thus there will be no exposure to the ads at all
    Make it free of them and people won't mind them

  22. Personallly as a High TFF army I disagree
    Small TFF run risk of losing coverts
    Large TFF can't attack as well
    Its balanced and works well

  23. Agree with lordstriker here.

  24. im against this
    Sabbers can then be made less vulnerable without needing DA to protect against 5*1

  25. Yup this is needed...

  26. theres a clear reason why ppl use elves
    And the bonus they recieve is adequate I think

  27. my thoughts exactly
    except that i was thinking this isnt runescape :P

powered by UserVoice