This game shouldnt be about how much you can click! boring! it should be about how good you are AND HOW MUCH TIME YOU SPEND at attacking for gold and banking your income. Click limits should be raised but not unlimited; UP cheaper and with a higer max production. Well organized alliances and commanders with many active officers would still grow more than lazy players.
I think that would be unfair. Why should late starters and small accounts be helped to get higher ranks? late starters shouldnt be compensated over players who started from the begining of each age. Small accounts is more complex: I voted for more afordable unit production and less recluting clicks allowed, so every body has the same chances of growing their army, thats whats needed.
wow great idea! I hadnt heard this one before. I'd love to join up with my commander against some enemies. Not so shure about how this could work but it sounds very interesting.
Yes! I'm ranked 230 and I cant sabb almost anything from a guy ranked 4500 who has only 50 m of SA, no DA nor spy nor sentry. And yes I am building up my DA but my 50 m spy should be able to do something to this guy. Its not fair.
to get higher in the ranks you need to improve your own account. And what does the top people having 3 million men have to do with handing off acounts? I think its wrong and it shouldnt be allowed, if you really cant keep playing your account too bad, sell it off. Its unfair that a player gets to play with an account he didnt builded up.
why? getting banned should be discouraged, not dealt with easier. Plus there are already temporally suspensions, it all depends on what was done wrong with an account.
Great idea, but maybe it could start by having the same races with some preestablished bonus (which should be smaller than they are now) and have some % of the total bonus for players to distribute as they like. Not shure if this is what alwaysl00king2 meant. So many cool posibilities here.
Come on guys, the point of this sugestions is to have an EASIER way to keep track of who you have attacked. Specially with this many attack turns, sometimes you can get more than one page of attacks done the same day. I agree with this, attacks done againts someone should be shown along with the intel reports when you click on the red eye next to their name on the battlefield.
Alliances having their own recruiter is something I'm against. All in all I think recruiting shoudnt be the main way to improve your stats, It should be one of many, so growth shound be controlled a lot more. I voted for banning the use of recriuters, but a official recruiter would be a good start to control growth and make it less important on your account developing.
Commanders would still have the bonus soldiers from their officers, so, we woulndt be seeing any hundred thousand armies, but whoever puts an effort to it, will grow more than the one who doesnt. Plus Mac users have a complete disadvantage on this, so no matter how much time I'm willing to invest on my account, its imposible for me to grow as much as everyone else who clicks, and that shouldnt be.
I also voted for less attack turns which will make finding gold and attacking more difficult and interesting, I also voted for cheaper unit production and a higher max to it, so that armies can actually grow, and will vote for allowing more clicks each day on the recruit link for the same reason. Alliances would have to be more organized about giving themselves clicks every day.
Thats the idea, to change the fact that clicking is the essence of this game. Its about getting a high rank by improving your stats right? but the way to improve your stats should be by being good at finding gold, banking properly and recruit the few soldiers you can with your recruit link each day, all of which require time, so that an account gets as good as the player spends time on it.
This game shouldnt be about how much you can click! boring! it should be about how good you are AND HOW MUCH TIME YOU SPEND at attacking for gold and banking your income. Click limits should be raised but not unlimited; UP cheaper and with a higer max production. Well organized alliances and commanders with many active officers would still grow more than lazy players.
0 Make clicking unlimited - 6 months ago
I think that would be unfair. Why should late starters and small accounts be helped to get higher ranks? late starters shouldnt be compensated over players who started from the begining of each age. Small accounts is more complex: I voted for more afordable unit production and less recluting clicks allowed, so every body has the same chances of growing their army, thats whats needed.
0 Upgrade deflation - 6 months ago
wow great idea! I hadnt heard this one before. I'd love to join up with my commander against some enemies. Not so shure about how this could work but it sounds very interesting.
0 introduce a 'call to war' feature - 6 months ago
or at least make them smaller, just a few characters to state a motto or something like that. Same as DarkReaper.
0 Remove AA all together - 6 months ago
Yes! I'm ranked 230 and I cant sabb almost anything from a guy ranked 4500 who has only 50 m of SA, no DA nor spy nor sentry. And yes I am building up my DA but my 50 m spy should be able to do something to this guy. Its not fair.
0 Make small accounts more sabbable - 6 months ago
And it makes usernames unpersonal, show some love for yours and commitment with your partners in the game. (sorry for the double post)
0 stop allowing people to hand off accounts. its ridiculous - 6 months ago
to get higher in the ranks you need to improve your own account. And what does the top people having 3 million men have to do with handing off acounts? I think its wrong and it shouldnt be allowed, if you really cant keep playing your account too bad, sell it off. Its unfair that a player gets to play with an account he didnt builded up.
0 stop allowing people to hand off accounts. its ridiculous - 6 months ago
why? getting banned should be discouraged, not dealt with easier. Plus there are already temporally suspensions, it all depends on what was done wrong with an account.
0 Only be banned for a limited amount of time when banned! - 6 months ago
Good idea.
0 steal weapons from defended attacks - 6 months ago
Great idea, but maybe it could start by having the same races with some preestablished bonus (which should be smaller than they are now) and have some % of the total bonus for players to distribute as they like. Not shure if this is what alwaysl00king2 meant. So many cool posibilities here.
0 eliminate races. Give players 100% to customise their army - 7 months ago
Come on guys, the point of this sugestions is to have an EASIER way to keep track of who you have attacked. Specially with this many attack turns, sometimes you can get more than one page of attacks done the same day. I agree with this, attacks done againts someone should be shown along with the intel reports when you click on the red eye next to their name on the battlefield.
0 farming warning system - 7 months ago
Alliances having their own recruiter is something I'm against. All in all I think recruiting shoudnt be the main way to improve your stats, It should be one of many, so growth shound be controlled a lot more. I voted for banning the use of recriuters, but a official recruiter would be a good start to control growth and make it less important on your account developing.
3 Official Kings of Chaos Recruiter - 7 months ago
Yes, along with banning the use of clickers and making unit production cheaper, this would improve the game so much!
1 Increase the number of clicks per day per user to 10x or 20x - 7 months ago
Commanders would still have the bonus soldiers from their officers, so, we woulndt be seeing any hundred thousand armies, but whoever puts an effort to it, will grow more than the one who doesnt. Plus Mac users have a complete disadvantage on this, so no matter how much time I'm willing to invest on my account, its imposible for me to grow as much as everyone else who clicks, and that shouldnt be.
3 ban click recuiting and make it fair for everyone! - 7 months ago
I also voted for less attack turns which will make finding gold and attacking more difficult and interesting, I also voted for cheaper unit production and a higher max to it, so that armies can actually grow, and will vote for allowing more clicks each day on the recruit link for the same reason. Alliances would have to be more organized about giving themselves clicks every day.
3 ban click recuiting and make it fair for everyone! - 7 months ago
Thats the idea, to change the fact that clicking is the essence of this game. Its about getting a high rank by improving your stats right? but the way to improve your stats should be by being good at finding gold, banking properly and recruit the few soldiers you can with your recruit link each day, all of which require time, so that an account gets as good as the player spends time on it.
3 ban click recuiting and make it fair for everyone! - 7 months ago